Final answer:
Outsourcing is primarily argued to minimize costs for firms and benefit relocated regions, potentially leading to workers in developed countries retraining for more advanced roles. however the claim that it ensures a better quality product for consumers is not a commonly accepted benefit and does not represent a typical argument in favor of outsourcing.
Step-by-step explanation:
Arguments in favor of outsourcing include a variety of factors, however, not all of them are unanimously agreed upon. One contentious point is whether it necessarily results in a better quality product for consumers. While outsourcing can minimize costs for the firm and benefit regions to where companies relocate leading potentially to increased worker productivity and economic growth, the aspect of quality can be subjective and industry-dependent. outsourcing typically focuses on cost efficiency and in some cases, might compromise product quality due to less stringent quality controls in the outsourced location.
On the other side, outsourcing is argued to free up domestic workers to re-train for more skilled, value-added vocations, potentially leading to a more advanced workforce. however, this transition can be complex and is not a guaranteed outcome as it depends on the availability of training programs and the adaptability of the workforce.
In summary, the assertion that outsourcing leads to better quality products is not considered a primary argument in favor of the practice and is not universally accepted as a benefit of outsourcing.