Final answer:
Rational persuasion is usually the best influence tactic to begin with as it involves the use of logic and facts. In peripheral route persuasion, which relies on superficial cues, factual information is not typically used, unlike endorsements or emotions.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the influence tactics one would use in a given situation. Among the options given, the best tactic to begin with is generally rational persuasion. This is because rational persuasion involves the use of logical arguments and factual evidence to convince someone of a particular point of view. It is considered a more direct and ethically sound approach compared to the other tactics listed.
In contrast, exchanging favors, appealing to a higher authority, and machiavellian tactics might be seen as manipulating the situation rather than addressing the problem or proposal directly. These tactics could potentially undermine trust and credibility if not used appropriately. Rational persuasion respects the agency and intellect of the other party and attempts an open and honest dialogue.
In terms of the example question provided, the concept that does not fit the list of cues used in peripheral route persuasion is d. factual information. Peripheral route persuasion typically involves superficial cues that affect emotions or exploit social influences, such as celebrity endorsement, positive emotions, and attractive models. Factual information is more aligned with the central route of persuasion, which involves a thoughtful consideration of the arguments presented and the evidence supporting them.