Final answer:
If an independent contractor does not fulfill their duties, the principal must still compensate them; however, the agent might owe damages to the principal if their performance lacks reasonable care, skill, and diligence.
Step-by-step explanation:
When an independent contractor's work does not meet the agent's duty of performance, the principal is still generally required to compensate the independent contractor. The correct answer to your question is: a. Yes, however, the agent is liable to the principal for damages if it does not perform his or her express duties or fails to meet the standards of reasonable care, skill, and diligence. This means that while the principal must uphold their end of the contractual agreement by providing compensation for the work done, they may also seek damages from the agent if the work was not performed satisfactorily.
Of course, this is predicated on the specifics of the contractual agreement. If the agent, in this case, the independent contractor, utterly fails to provide the service or work as per the contract, then the answer could be different, and the principal might not be obligated to pay, but could still require the agent to indemnify them for any losses incurred. This seems to align with expectations in contract law that both parties honor their respective duties.