227k views
0 votes
A hardware store currently outsources the cutting of wood sheets, and are considering cutting in-house to save money. Their cutting orders amount to 12,000 units. Using the following information, should they outsource or continue to cut the wood in-house? If done in-house, the fixed cost for new machinery is $380,000 while the variable cost would be $12 per unit. Alternatively, they can outsource the full quantity of 12,000 units for a total of $500,000.

Should they cut in-house or outsource?

User Siddhartha
by
9.0k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Based on the provided costs, it is more cost-effective for the hardware store to outsource the cutting of wood sheets since the total cost of outsourcing ($500,000) is less than the total cost of cutting in-house ($524,000).

Step-by-step explanation:

To decide whether the hardware store should cut wood in-house or outsource, we need to compare the total costs of both options. If the store decides to cut the wood in-house, the total cost will be the sum of the fixed costs for new machinery and the variable costs per unit. The fixed cost is $380,000 and the variable cost per unit is $12. Hence, for 12,000 units, the variable cost would be 12,000 units * $12/unit = $144,000. Adding the fixed costs, the in-house total cost would be $380,000 + $144,000 = $524,000.

On the other hand, if the store decides to outsource, the total cost is given as $500,000 for the full quantity of 12,000 units. Comparing both total costs, outsourcing the cutting ($500,000) is less expensive than cutting in-house ($524,000).

Therefore, based on this analysis, it is more cost-effective for the hardware store to outsource the cutting of wood sheets.

User Marco Johannesen
by
8.0k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.