Final answer:
To ensure ethical research, JP should obtain IRB approval, ensure informed consent, maintain accurate records, report honestly, adhere to ASA guidelines, and respect subject confidentiality and autonomy. Principles such as beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice should guide research involving human participants.
Step-by-step explanation:
Ethical and Procedural Steps in Research Design
In designing a research study, JP could have taken numerous ethical and procedural steps to ensure the integrity of his research. To begin with, JP should have obtained approval from an institutional review board (IRB), which is critical in overseeing the study's ethical compliance, especially when human subjects are involved. Next, ensuring informed consent from participants is essential; this involves not only securing agreement to participate but also ensuring that subjects understand the study's aims and any associated risks. Accurate record-keeping and honest reporting of methodologies and results are foundational to the research process; this includes reporting any changes to measuring instruments and providing a truthful account of the number of subjects involved.
In accordance with the American Sociological Association (ASA) and other organizations' guidelines, researchers like JP should conduct their studies without bias and maintain the confidentiality and autonomy of their subjects. Additionally, the principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice should guide all interactions and procedures involving research participants. It is also important for researchers to respect patients' rights and the ethical standards related to clinical practice if their research involves medical or psychological elements.
Moreover, in instances where microbiology experiments or clinical practices are involved, it is crucial to get all protocols approved by an institutional animal care and use committee if using animal subjects, to ensure humane treatment. Lastly, when studies are funded, the sources of funding should not influence the findings or publication, maintaining a separation between funding and academic integrity.