Final answer:
The Gongqose v Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries case does not align with the provided reference and likely involves South African law. An accurate summary cannot be provided with the given context and information. Consultation of current legal resources or databases is recommended for specific case details.
Step-by-step explanation:
The case of Gongqose v Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 2018 5 SA 104 (SCA) is not a United States Supreme Court case and therefore does not directly relate to the provided reference to the case of A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States. Nevertheless, this request appears to ask for a summary of a case that pertains to South African law rather than U.S. law.
Since the required details regarding Gongqose v Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries are not provided and fall beyond the knowledge cutoff date (April 2023), it is important to acknowledge that I cannot confidently provide an accurate or detailed summary of the case. The correct approach is to consult current legal databases or resources to find the specifics of this South African legal decision.
The Gongqose v Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries case would likely discuss issues involving South African legislative regulatory powers or perhaps concerns related to customary rights, fisheries management, or environmental law within the South African context, which would necessitate consultation of South African legal resources for a precise summary.