Question

According to our textbook, remedy at law and remedy at equity are differentiated by

A) the fact that equitable remedies are more common whereas remedies at law are much more difficult to attain.
B) the fact that one takes the form of money awards and the other takes the form of forced or prohibited action.
C) the fact that you can only seek one type of remedy at a time, thus no one is eligible to receive both types of remedies.
D) the fact that one arises from violations of criminal law and the other arises from violations of civil law.

Answer 1

Remedy at law usually refers to monetary compensation, whereas remedy at equity involves specific performance or injunctions. The distinction is rooted in historical English legal practices but today's courts may grant both types of remedies.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the textbook, remedy at law and remedy at equity are differentiated by B) the fact that one takes the form of money awards and the other takes the form of forced or prohibited action. A remedy at law typically involves a monetary award to the injured party, whereas a remedy at equity may compel one party to take or refrain from a specific action. The traditional distinction comes from historical practices in the English legal system where courts of law could only award money damages, while courts of equity (Chancery Courts) could issue orders to act, or to refrain from acting, thus enforcing equitable principles. Today, in many jurisdictions, courts can issue both legal and equitable remedies, depending on what is just in the circumstances of the case.