192k views
0 votes
Which statement primarily appeals to logos, or reason, to support the position that laws that forbid texting while driving are necessary for public safety?

A. As a daily commuter, I see dozens of people on the road using their phones
while driving. They are sometimes so distracted that they drift into my lane.
B. I can't begin to imagine how terrible I'd feel if my trivial text message cost
someone his life.
C. With distracted drivers causing eighteen percent of all fatal car crashes in
America, prohibiting texting while driving is an obvious step in the right
direction.

User Realgt
by
7.3k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The statement citing statistical evidence of distracted drivers causing a significant percentage of fatal car crashes best appeals to logos in support of laws against texting while driving.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that primarily appeals to logos, or reason, to support the position that laws forbidding texting while driving are necessary for public safety is:

"With distracted drivers causing eighteen percent of all fatal car crashes in America, prohibiting texting while driving is an obvious step in the right direction."

This statement uses statistical evidence to logically argue for the necessity of laws against texting while driving. It establishes a causal relationship between distracted driving and fatal car crashes, leveraging data to appeal to the reader's sense of reason.

User Ilan
by
7.8k points