Question

Carlos is trying to make an anthropological case against the practice of divorce. What argument can he make that relates directly to the societal function

of marriage, as anthropologist see it?
A. Divorce violates sacred vows taken by spouses.
B. Divorce is morally reprehensible as it splits up a family.
C. Divorce creates unnecessary family out-groups.
D. Divorce weakens the family unit's ability to support children.

Answer 1

Answer: D Divorce weakens the family unit's ability to support children.

Step-by-step explanation:

Divorce weakens the family unit's ability to support children.

Answer 2

Carlos can argue against divorce by emphasizing its impact on the societal function of marriage, particularly how it may weaken the family's ability to support children.

Step-by-step explanation:

Carlos could argue against the practice of divorce by focusing on the societal function of marriage as seen by anthropologists. Societies typically view marriage and families as institutions that contribute to social structure, with marriages creating families and fostering status roles that are socially recognized and sanctioned. One possible argument against divorce is that it weakens the family unit's ability to support children, reflecting the crucial role of marital stability for the welfare of offspring within this basic social unit.