Final answer:
The notion that balance in design necessarily involves symmetrical imagery is false; balance can be symmetrical or asymmetrical. Symmetrical balance is mirrored and stable, while asymmetrical balance involves different but visually even elements, creating dynamism.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that balance in design requires images to be symmetrical, with nearly identical content on left and right sides, is false. Balance in art refers to the even distribution of visual weight, and this can be achieved through both symmetrical and asymmetrical balance. Symmetrical balance is indeed characterized by a compositional design that is mirrored on either side of the artwork's axis, creating a sense of stability and formality. However, asymmetrical balance uses different elements on each side of an artwork, which can still balance each other in terms of visual weight, detail, or color, leading to a more dynamic and visually interesting composition.
For example, the Moon Jellyfish shows natural symmetry and a central anchoring element in its design. Yet, asymmetrical balance is also prevalent and effective in art, as seen in the Classical Greek sculpture Doryphoros by Polykleitos, where a non-mirrored pose, called contrapposto, still provides a balanced and calm appearance. The term bilateral symmetric refers to the two-sided symmetry where each side is a mirror image of the other, as opposed to asymmetry which can involve offset positioning and contrasts to create a visually appealing balance.