169k views
3 votes
Does a recursive rule for an arithmetic sequence always need to include at least one term of the sequence? Explain.

User Owlzy
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Yes, a recursive rule for an arithmetic sequence always needs to include at least one term of the sequence because the recursive rule defines the relationship between terms. Without a known term to start with, it is impossible to determine the subsequent terms using the rule.

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes, a recursive rule for an arithmetic sequence always needs to include at least one term of the sequence. This is because a recursive rule defines how each term in the sequence is related to the previous term(s). In order to determine the value of a term using the recursive rule, you need a known term to start with.

For example, let's consider an arithmetic sequence with a first term of 3 and a common difference of 2:

  1. The first term is 3.
  2. The recursive rule states that to find the next term, you add 2 to the previous term: an = an-1 + 2.
  3. To find the second term, you plug in the first term into the recursive rule: a2 = a1 + 2 = 3 + 2 = 5.

Without knowing the first term, it would be impossible to use the recursive rule and determine the value of subsequent terms in the sequence.

User SimenB
by
8.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories