198k views
3 votes
Critics of US foreign policy complained that American Imperialism

a. Benefited the invaded nations more than the US
b. Didn't protect American business from foreign imports
c. Resulted in US rule over people without their consent
d. Failed to protect American business investments overseas

User Okram
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

American Imperialism often led to US control over nations without their consent, reflecting a contradiction to American democratic ideals and disregarding the condition of people in affected countries. Economic dominance by US investors prevailed in the era of corporate colonialism and geopolitical interests, particularly anti-Communism, overshadowed humanitarian concerns.

Step-by-step explanation:

Critics of US foreign policy during the era of American Imperialism often point to the negative repercussions of the United States' policies on the nations that were affected by them. A major complaint was that American Imperialism resulted in the US exerting rule over people without their consent, contrasting sharply with the American values of liberty and self-governance. This period was marked by the US extending its political, economic, and military control over other nations, which critics argue ran counter to the country's democratic ideals and often disregarded the perspectives and well-being of the people in the developing nations involved.

The spread of corporate colonialism and neocolonial tactics during the 19th century also meant that newly independent nations faced economic dominance by US investors. The humanitarian aid provided by the US was often overshadowed by the pursuit of geopolitical interests, such as the containment of Communism during the Cold War, resulting in a troubling legacy that complicated international relations for decades.

User John Rix
by
7.7k points