Final answer:
The statement is false; the tradition of unlimited debate applies to the Senate but not the House of Representatives, which has more restrictive rules for debate.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that both the House and Senate pride themselves on their traditions of unlimited debate is false. This tradition applies to the United States Senate but not to the House of Representatives. In the Senate, there has been a longstanding tradition of unlimited debate, which allows for the use of filibuster, where senators can delay or block legislative action unless a supermajority of 60 senators vote for a cloture motion to end the debate. In contrast, the House employs more stringent rules on debate due to its larger size, which limit the amount of time each representative may speak on a legislative issue.