Final answer:
Paternalism infringes on autonomy is a true statement because it involves making decisions for others without their consent, often justified by a belief that the decision-maker knows what's best. Examples of paternalism can be seen in legal and historical settings, where authorities have imposed limitations or controls on the autonomy of individuals or groups.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement Paternalism infringes on autonomy is a true statement. Paternalism refers to an attitude or policy that limits a person's or group's liberty or autonomy for what is presumed to be that person's or group's own good. It operates on the belief that the authority knows what is best for those under care and can involve making decisions for them without their consent.
For example, a state that enacts laws to prohibit unhealthy food choices because it deems it is not in the best interest of its citizens is exercising paternalism, thereby infringing on the autonomy of individuals to make those choices for themselves.
Similarly, parents can often provide consent on behalf of their children because children are not legally competent to make such decisions for themselves. This too can be considered a form of paternalism.
The effects of paternalism can extend into law and governance. For instance, the colonial governors had the power to veto legislation passed by the colonial assemblies, which is a form of paternalistic power. Comparatively, the necessary and proper clause, mentioned in Exercise 9.3.1, is often argued to have expanded the power of the national government rather than limited it. Therefore, the statement that the clause has limited government power is false. Additionally, claims that no state constitution in the Revolutionary Era allowed women the right to vote is true, reflecting the paternalistic views of the time concerning gender roles.