Final answer:
The statement suggesting that anonymity always leads to harder work due to freedom from evaluative pressure is false. While anonymity can reduce pressure, it can also result in social loafing, unless the task is complicated and individuals are motivated to contribute meaningfully.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement “When people feel anonymous they work harder because they are free of evaluative pressure” is generally considered false. The research suggests that anonymity in a group can sometimes lead to a reduction in accountability, known as social loafing. This tends to occur when the task at hand is simple or when individual contributions are not clearly evaluated. However, when a task is complex and difficult, the effects can be different. In such situations, the lack of pressure and anxiety due to the anonymity can put individuals in a relaxed state. This can lead to improved performance if they are motivated and believe their contributions are necessary for the group's success. In summary, feelings of anonymity can both hinder and enhance performance, dependent on the nature of the task and the individual's motivation. Consequently, the blanket statement that anonymity always leads to harder work due to freedom from evaluative pressure is not supported by psychological research.