Final answer:
Joel's use of a domination conflict resolution strategy by threatening to quit over a raise can be viewed as a confrontational negotiation tactic, which might not be the most effective or professional approach compared to more collaborative strategies. Tracy's advice to Noel about considering workplace culture suggests that being disruptive may not be beneficial.
Step-by-step explanation:
Whether Joel's use of a domination conflict resolution strategy by threatening to quit his job if he didn't get the raise he wanted is correct or not can be debated depending on one's perspective on negotiation tactics and what is considered acceptable or not in a professional setting. A domination strategy typically involves the use of power to win a conflict at the expense of the other party's interests, which could include threats or ultimatums. In contrast to the businessman who comforts himself with the idea that hard work is its own reward without directly asking for a raise, or the employee who justifies their actions in a situation of denied raises, Joel's direct approach can be seen as confrontational and may not be the most effective or professional means of conflict resolution. Moreover, Tracy's advice to Noel in a similar workplace scenario emphasizes the importance of fitting within an existing workplace culture rather than being disruptive, suggesting that more collaborative or integrative strategies might be preferable. Davis and Moore's theory further underlines that society operates efficiently when individuals are motivated by the rewards associated with their work, but to leverage this effectively, one's approach needs to take into account the workplace dynamics and the impact on professional relationships.