Final answer:
The primary difference is that reflection of meaning involves the listener deeply engaging with and validating the speaker's message focusing on its deeper significance, while interpretation/reframe involves reshaping the message to introduce a new perspective or understanding.
Step-by-step explanation:
The major differences between an interpretation/reframe and a reflection of meaning is that in the latter, the listener focuses on understanding and articulating the deeper significance of what the speaker is saying. Reflection of meaning involves a more profound engagement with the content, considering the emotional, symbolic, or thematic elements present in the communication. It is less about altering the message, as in a reframing or interpretation, and more about delving into its significance and how it resonates with the individual or a broader context. This requires careful listening, attentiveness to not only the words but also the emotional undercurrents, and a thoughtful response that mirrors the essence of the speaker's message back to them, affirming that their experience is heard and understood.
On the other hand, interpretation/reframe involves processing the speaker's message through one's own filter, often reshaping it to present a new perspective or understanding. This may include integrating personal experience, contextual knowledge, and rhetorical elements to construct a unique viewpoint, potentially offering the speaker a different way to see their situation or narrative. It can be especially useful when the goal is to change a viewpoint or introduce alternative thinking.