Final answer:
Research does not directly compare incomes between daughters of stay-at-home and working mothers in Conley's 'The Pecking Order,' but it suggests broader influences of family dynamics, and the 'motherhood penalty' affects women's income.
Step-by-step explanation:
Research indicates that daughters raised by stay-at-home mothers tend to fare differently in terms of income compared to those with working moms. This is due to a complex set of factors that influence women's wages and career trajectories. One such factor is the 'motherhood penalty,' which can result in women with families and children being paid about 7% to 14% less than other women of similar education and work experience. Additionally, the income control within a household has implications on spending habits and children's welfare.
The Pecking Order theory by Dalton Conley suggests that family dynamics and parental roles potentially shape children's future economic outcomes, though his work does not specifically compare the average income between daughters of stay-at-home and working mothers. Evidence points to a broader influence where class dynamics and gender roles, including the expectations and opportunities afforded to children, can perpetuate the class system.