167k views
1 vote
A real estate professional is selling a home to a buyer and told her that the foundation was "solid as a rock" when he knew for a fact that it was slowly sinking into the landfill on which it was built. Now that the sale is completed, which of the following is LEAST likely to happen to the real estate professional?

A)
Suit to recover money damages experienced by the buyer due to basement leakage
B)
Successful defense against all charges based on loyalty to his client-seller
C)
Being charged with intentional misrepresentation
D)
Revocation of his license for failure to disclose a material fact

User LNendza
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The least likely outcome for a real estate professional who knowingly misled a buyer is a successful defense based on loyalty to the seller, as this does not justify misleading the buyer. The professional is more likely to face intentional misrepresentation charges, license revocation, or a lawsuit for damages.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question revolves around potential consequences for a real estate professional who misled a buyer about the condition of a home's foundation. Among the listed outcomes, successful defense against all charges based on loyalty to his client-seller is the least likely. Loyalty to a seller does not permit a real estate agent to deceive a buyer. Any intentional misrepresentation about the property can lead to the real estate professional being charged with intentional misrepresentation. Furthermore, because the real estate professional failed to disclose a material fact, which is a serious violation, he could face the revocation of his license. As for the buyer, they would have a strong case for a suit to recover money damages due to the misrepresented foundation leading to basement leakage and other potential issues arising from the sinking foundation.

User Ali Ok
by
7.9k points