Question

Which of the following is true regarding the difference between Creatine ingested as whole protein foods compared to Creatine ingested as a solution?

1. when ingested as a intact whole protein, the creatine produces more sustained effects
2. Both (meat and solutions) forms of Creatine yield the same absolute levels of Creatine to tissue.
3. When ingested as a solution, plasma Creatine increases rapidly
4. all are correct

Answer 1

The true statement regarding the different forms of creatine ingestion is that when ingested as a solution, plasma creatine increases rapidly. Other assertions, such as both forms yielding the same levels to tissue, and the sustained effect of whole proteins, are less definitive and lack consistent scientific support.

Step-by-step explanation:

The ingestion of creatine can differ based on its form, be it ingested through whole protein foods or as a solution. When creatine is consumed as intact whole protein, it is thought that it might produce a more sustained effect, although there's no strong consensus or comprehensive studies confirming this. Plasma creatine levels do however increase rapidly when it is ingested as a solution, which confirms statement 3 as true. As for providing the same absolute levels of creatine to tissue, this is variable and can depend on other factors such as the presence of protein and carbohydrates, which can enhance its effect, making statement 2 potentially true but not definitive.

Creatine is notable for increasing cell volumization by drawing water into muscle cells and aiding in the supply of energy to muscle cells via creatine phosphate replenishment of ATP, which is especially beneficial for short bursts of energy required in activities like weight lifting.