Final Answer:
b) It's a Material Fact because Disclosing Seller Carrie's reason for moving is contingent on it being a material fact influencing the real estate transaction.
Step-by-step explanation:
In real estate transactions, the disclosure of information about a seller's reason for moving is typically governed by the principle of materiality. A material fact is one that could influence a buyer's decision to purchase the property.
The disclosure of Seller Carrie's reason for moving becomes relevant and permissible if it is considered a material fact. This ensures transparency and fairness in the real estate transaction, allowing the buyer to make informed decisions.
In this context, "material fact" implies that the information is significant enough to impact the buyer's decision-making process, making it a crucial element in the disclosure process.
The other options (a, c, and d) are not as directly related to the disclosure of the seller's reason for moving. Option a) requires explicit consent from the seller, while option c) involves the buyer specifically requesting the information.
Option d) refers to scenarios where disclosure may be mandated by state law, but this doesn't inherently cover the seller's reason for moving unless it qualifies as a material fact.
Therefore, in the given scenario, the most appropriate and general condition for disclosing Seller Carrie's reason for moving is when it is considered a material fact in the context of the real estate transaction.