83.9k views
4 votes
Sam Watkins just ate cookies and, therefore, feels justified in refusing food offered by his Asian host. In this instance, Sam's self-reference criterion has just saved him from making a cultural blunder.

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

Refusing food based on personal satiety without considering cultural implications may still lead to a cultural blunder. Recognizing the importance of cultural norms around hospitality and the potential negative effects of ethnocentrism is crucial.

Step-by-step explanation:

Sam Watkins's decision to refuse food offered by his Asian host due to having already eaten cookies does not necessarily reflect a successful avoidance of a cultural blunder. Instead, this action could be influenced by his self-reference criterion, a term used in anthropology and cross-cultural communication, which refers to the unconscious reliance on one's own cultural experience as the standard for decision-making. The student's question seems to suggest that Sam used his own cultural norms about eating and refusing food to navigate a potentially uncomfortable situation. However, it is essential to understand the cultural context in which the refusal takes place. For instance, in some Asian cultures, refusing food can be seen as disrespectful, whereas in others, it might be perfectly acceptable after showing gratitude. Understanding these nuances is crucial to avoiding a cultural blunder. Additionally, ethnocentrism, which can be defined as the belief in the superiority of one's own culture, often leads individuals to misinterpret or mishandle cross-cultural interactions. Therefore, Sam's response could be seen as a cultural misunderstanding if it negatively impacts the host-guest relationship, even though he may have been full from eating cookies prior to the offer.

User Vernomcrp
by
6.9k points