Final answer:
The inclusion or omission of evidence should be based on its potential influence on a reasonable person's judgment in a legal matter.
Step-by-step explanation:
When determining whether a piece of evidence should be included or omitted, a key consideration is whether it would influence or change the judgment of a reasonable person. In the legal context, this is important because the goal is to ensure the fairness of a trial and the accuracy of the judgment.
For example, if a piece of evidence is highly relevant and would significantly impact a reasonable person's judgment, it should usually be included. On the other hand, if a piece of evidence is irrelevant or would not make a substantial difference to a reasonable person, it may be omitted.
In summary, the inclusion or omission of evidence in a legal matter should be based on the potential influence or change it would have on a reasonable person's judgment.