The statement is false. Comparability requires accurate comparisons between similar entities to avoid incorrect conclusions. Surface similarities can be deceptive and should not compromise the assessment of fundamental similarities.
The statement 'Comparability is not enhanced by making unlike things look alike or making like things look different' is false. Comparability as a concept in various fields, such as legal studies, business, and economics, suggests that it is important to be able to make accurate comparisons between similar entities or situations. For instance, in accounting, comparability is a principle that supports investors and creditors in identifying the similarities and differences between two sets of economic events. Making unlike things look alike distorts this view and can lead to incorrect conclusions, while making like things look different can obscure important similarities that are relevant for a fair comparison.
Differentiating between superficial similarity and fundamental similarity is crucial as it can affect decision-making and perceptions. In biology, for example, organisms that look alike may not be related at all, and in physics, understanding the difference between constructive and destructive interference is important for explaining phenomena such as wave superposition, regardless of if the waves have different frequencies. In a social context, such as comparing cultural or social changes brought by economic shifts, similarities and differences must be carefully discerned to trace their true impact.