Final answer:
A comprehensive disaster plan mandates preparedness for any type of disaster, regardless of various factors such as severity, location, timing, and cause. Given the unpredictable nature of disasters and the potential for significant impact on society, having a preparedness plan is critical. Not preparing (Plan A) carries asymmetric risk compared to being prepared (Plan B), which can mitigate catastrophic outcomes.
Step-by-step explanation:
A disaster plan requires readiness regardless of the severity of the disaster, the location of the disaster, the time of the disaster, and the cause of the disaster. Effectively, this means being prepared for any eventuality, whether it's a mild or a catastrophic incident, close to home or far away, at an inconvenient time or during normal circumstances, and regardless of whether the disaster is natural or man-made. Drawing from the concept of asymmetric risk, Plan B (preparing for the disaster) is always preferable to Plan A (doing nothing). Especially considering human ecology and the increasing frequency of natural disasters impacting larger populations, it's important to process abstract information, anticipate unprecedented situations, and make sacrifices for the greater good to ensure a timely response. Referencing engineering efforts to protect against natural catastrophes, individuals, and societies must accept that while we can't predict the future with certainty, preparing for potential disasters is essential. This includes having materials and plans such as emergency shelters or boarding up windows in case of tornadoes. Recognizing that resource disruptions can lead to significant consequences, including economic and military actions, disaster preparedness is crucial not only for survival but for maintaining societal structure in the face of possible rapid changes.