Final answer:
Markup pricing is problematic because it ignores demand, which is a core factor in determining prices in a flexible market based on supply and demand. By relying on a set markup to determine prices, businesses fail to account for the perceived value of their products and market dynamics, potentially leading to mispriced items and inefficiencies.
Step-by-step explanation:
The strongest reason that markup pricing generally does not make sense is option 4: This method ignores demand. In a market guided by supply and demand, prices adjust to reflect the value that consumers place on products and the cost of resources used in production. Markup pricing, by simply adding a standard profit margin to the cost, does not take into consideration the product's perceived value or changes in consumer preferences. As a result, it could either overprice items, reducing sales, or underprice them, missing potential profits.
In contrast, the price system based on supply and demand is flexible, adjusts to unforeseen events, and reflects changes in market conditions without the need for bureaucratic control. Moreover, in situations where information is imperfect, prices can convey implied quality, leading to market disequilibria. For example, a car dealer lowering prices may inadvertently signal poor quality, leading to lower demand than expected. Conversely, raising prices might suggest higher quality and increase demand.
Additionally, price adjustments carry inherent costs—menu costs—stemming from changes to marketing materials, billing records, and customer perceptions. These costs reinforce why prices in the economy do not change instantaneously in response to supply and demand shifts, highlighting the benefits of setting prices strategically rather than mechanically relying on a fixed markup.