Final answer:
Grouping users into distinct classes should consider meaningful criteria such as sociocultural backgrounds or power dynamics, rather than superficial attributes. Meaningful classifications are based on significant characteristics that reflect the true diversity of individuals.
Step-by-step explanation:
The criteria that are not core sorts of differences to group users into distinct user classes relates to superficial attributes that do not accurately reflect the complexity and diversity of the individuals within those groups. For instance, grouping users based on arbitrary characteristics such as their favorite color would not be a meaningful way to classify them in most scenarios. Instead, meaningful classifications may consider factors such as social, cultural, and economic backgrounds, interaction levels, or relative power and control over their lives as suggested by sociological perspectives. It's important to remember that people are multifaceted and may not fit neatly into predefined categories.
When classifying entities like motor vehicles or biological organisms, classifications can be based on color, manufacturer, or the type of vehicle, and in biology, organisms might be grouped based on more significant characteristics beyond superficial ones like flower color. In society, group classifications might consider the complex interactions of primary groups and the comparative interactions of secondary groups, or power dynamics across different social classes like upper, middle, and lower class divisions.
Categories like "Millennials" highlight that a shared characteristic does not necessarily mean that individuals frequently interact and thus form a coherent group. It's the depth of the relationships and interactions, plus the shared values or goals, that turn a category into a social group.