Final answer:
The Software Requirements Specification (SRS) should not be called a Business Requirements Document (BRD) as a BRD defines business needs and goals rather than the detailed technical specifications outlined in an SRS.
Step-by-step explanation:
Software Requirements Specification
The Software Requirements Specification (SRS) should not be called a business requirements document (BRD). A BRD is focused on the business requirements, capturing what the business wants to achieve, whereas the SRS is aimed at describing the software product's functions, features, and operational constraints in technical terms. The SRS serves as a bridge between the business team and the technical team, laying out the system functionality in detail which includes user requirements, system specification, and functional specification. The SRS is also known as a requirements document or a product specification in different organizational contexts.
User requirements and system specifications are terms that can be used interchangeably with SRS. The term functional specification is sometimes used to refer specifically to the part of the SRS that deals with the functionality of the software. However, calling the SRS the BRD would not be appropriate as it may lead to ambiguity in the level of detail and focus of the document. It is critical for the SRS to be detailed and technical, providing clear guidelines for developers and engineers.