Final answer:
Technology in the field of Corrections brings both enhancements and challenges. Advances like DNA testing improve the system but are offset by security risks and potential failures. A balance is needed between the benefits of technological tools and the protection of civil liberties in the corrections environment.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question of whether technology has become less reliable in the field of Corrections is nuanced and does not have a straightforward answer. Technological advancements have played a significant role in enhancing the efficacy of the corrections system through methods such as DNA testing, which has exonerated wrongfully convicted individuals. However, the same technological progression brings with it challenges like security risks, potential system failures, and a growing digital divide. These risks are compounded by a societal dependence on technology that could lead to systemic vulnerabilities, particularly in critical sectors like corrections.
Moreover, the efficiency promised by technology is occasionally belied by failures in delivery, evidenced by frustration with slow internet or dropped calls. The broader role of technology in society, and by extension in the field of Corrections, underscores the need for vigilant consideration of the benefits it offers against the potential for misuse and the loss of privacy and freedom.
While some view the American criminal justice system's heavy reliance on incarceration as an issue amplified by the powerful prison-industry complex, it is the interplay with technology that necessitates a fine balance between harnessing its benefits for societal good and guarding against the erosion of civil liberties.