Final answer:
In program evaluation, both the outcomes and the context are critical for an accurate assessment. This includes understanding cultural, social, and historical aspects, employing methods like counterfactual designs, and performing analyses at an ecological level to reflect true impacts.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the importance of measuring both dependent variables and the context in impact assessment. In program evaluation, it is not enough to measure just the outcomes (dependent variables); understanding the context within which a program operates is essential. This includes considering cultural, social, and historical factors that may affect the program's implementation and results. For instance, according to Ferraro and Pattanayak (2006), a counterfactual design offers a more accurate measure of conservation success by using control groups. Furthermore, an ecological level analysis is crucial because it takes into account the complex interactions within communities, ensuring that evaluations are reflective of the true impact on individuals' quality of life and well-being. Additionally, the power dynamics and context in academic writing must be appreciated, as it influences research outcomes and interpretations.