Final answer:
In Act 3 of 12 Angry Men, the vote is evenly split between guilt and innocence, highlighting the conflict and tension among the jurors.
Step-by-step explanation:
In Act 3 of 12 Angry Men, the vote stands at 6 in favor of 'guilty' and 6 in favor of 'not guilty'. This is a crucial moment in the play as it shows the jury to be evenly divided and highlights the conflict and tension among the jurors.
This is demonstrated when Juror #8, the protagonist, presents doubt and reasonable doubt about the guilt of the accused, causing the jury to take a second look at the evidence and reconsider their initial votes.
It is important to note that the power dynamics of the jury change throughout Act 3 as Juror #8 continues to persuade and challenge the others, leading to a shift in votes and further development of the plot.