Final answer:
The statement 'No vampire movies are films without blood' is a universal negative proposition. It is universal because it refers to all vampire movies and negative because it excludes them from the category of films without blood. The subject is distributed and the predicate is distributed.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement "No vampire movies are films without blood" can be analyzed in terms of categorical logic. This statement is a universal negative proposition. When we say it is universal, we are asserting that the statement applies to all vampire movies without exception. Since it is negative, it is excluding vampire movies from the category of films without blood.
Breaking down the proposition follows:
- Universal: The statement refers to all vampire movies.
- Negative: It states that vampire movies are not in the set of bloodless films.
- Subject (vampire movies): Distributed, because it talks about all vampire movies.
- Predicate (films without blood): Distributed, since the universal negative proposition implies that none of the vampire movies are included in the category of films without blood.
The correct answer, based on this analysis, is option 4: Universal, Negative, Undistributed, Distributed.