Final answer:
Based on the given cost structure for the two sites and the production levels, neither Site A nor Site B is universally preferred at the specified production rates, and we cannot confirm the break-even point without the selling price. Therefore, none of the given statements can be determined as true with the information provided.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks to find out the truth about the break-even model for two different manufacturing locations with the given costs. To determine which statement is true, we calculate the break-even point where total costs equal total revenues (Fixed Costs + Variable Costs per unit * Quantity = Price per unit * Quantity). However, there is no price per unit provided, which means we cannot calculate the break-even point directly. Instead, we can compare the costs for the given production rates to infer which location is preferred.
Let's calculate the total cost for 1000 units for both sites:
Site A: 50,000 + (10 * 1000) = 60,000
Site B: 20,000 + (30 * 1000) = 50,000
So, for 1000 units, Site B is the desired location due to lower total costs.
Now let's calculate for 2000 units:
Site A: 50,000 + (10 * 2000) = 70,000
Site B: 20,000 + (30 * 2000) = 80,000
For 2000 units, Site A is the desired location.
Without specific selling prices, we cannot determine the exact break-even point, but based on the information given, we can conclude that statements a and c are incorrect, while statements b and d are not verifiable. Therefore, none of the given statements can be determined as true with the information provided.