Final answer:
The Montt trial used eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence, documentary evidence, and circumstantial evidence. These types of evidence are critical to forming a solid case and must align with the standards of the legal field and the requirements of the trial.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the Montt trial, the kinds of evidence that have been used are A) Eyewitness testimony, B) Forensic evidence, C) Documentary evidence, and D) Circumstantial evidence. Choosing the right type of evidence is crucial, as it must support the argument effectively and adhere to the standards of the field.
Eyewitness testimony is often given significant weight in trials, although its reliability can be questioned. Forensic evidence helps provide factual grounding through scientific methods. Documentary evidence includes written or recorded materials that are relevant to the case, while circumstantial evidence allows for inferences to be drawn about a fact in question.
When presenting evidence, one should consider its ability to support the thesis or argument, ensuring it is verifiable and meets the instructor's or field's requirements. Various fields may require different standards for what counts as convincing evidence.