89.2k views
0 votes
What were the unintended consequences of spraying for the spruce budworm in 1953 and 1954?

a) Increased biodiversity.
b) Elimination of the pest.
c) Environmental damage.
d) Improved crop yields.

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The unintended consequences of spraying for the spruce budworm in the 1950s involved significant environmental damage, including the decline of non-target species and disruption of ecosystems due to the use of DDT and other pesticides.

Step-by-step explanation:

The unintended consequences of spraying for the spruce budworm in 1953 and 1954 were primarily negative environmental impacts, which includes various forms of environmental damage. One such consequence was the devastating effects on non-target species, such as the decline in raptor populations due to DDT residues causing thin eggshells, as noted by Lundholm in 1997. Environmental effects of pesticides extend beyond target pest populations and can impact biodiversity, human health, and ecosystems as a whole.

It is clear from historical accounts and scientific studies, including those by Rachel Carson in her seminal work Silent Spring, that the excessive and widespread use of chemical pesticides can lead to bioaccumulation, a buildup of toxins in the bodies of predators like birds, possibly causing significant damage to wildlife populations. The intention behind using pesticides may have been to improve conditions such as crop yields, but the side effects often included unintended and irreversible harm to the environment.

User Ivan Dokov
by
7.6k points