Final answer:
This response provides examples and explanations of dominant syntax structure, how exhaustive domination applies to linguistic syntax, the components of exhaustive domination in syntax, and a comparison between exhaustive and partial domination in syntax.
Step-by-step explanation:
(A) Provide an example of a dominant syntax structure:
An example of a dominant syntax structure is subject-verb-object (SVO). In this structure, the subject is the doer of the action, the verb is the action itself, and the object is the recipient of the action. For example, in the sentence 'She ate an apple,' 'She' is the subject, 'ate' is the verb, and 'an apple' is the object.
(B) Explain how exhaustive domination applies to linguistic syntax:
Exhaustive domination in linguistic syntax refers to the idea that every sentence in a language must be analyzed in terms of syntactic categories and structures. It means that all possible combinations and arrangements of words in a sentence should be accounted for in the syntactic analysis. This helps establish the rules and patterns of sentence formation in a language.
(C) Identify the components of exhaustive domination in syntax:
The components of exhaustive domination in syntax include lexical categories (nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc.), phrases (noun phrases, verb phrases, prepositional phrases, etc.), and sentence structures (subject-verb-object, subject-verb, etc.). These components help determine the grammatical structure of a sentence and the relationships between different elements within it.
(D) Compare and contrast exhaustive and partial domination in syntax:
Exhaustive domination in syntax requires that every aspect of a sentence be accounted for in the syntactic analysis, ensuring that all possible combinations and arrangements of words are included. In contrast, partial domination allows for the possibility of incomplete or partial analyses, where certain aspects of a sentence may be left unaccounted for. Partial domination allows for more flexibility in analyzing complex or ambiguous sentences.