Final answer:
Typewritten materials can be traceable to a specific typewriter or suspect, making the statement false. The Supreme Court has determined that the press's right to print classified material is partial, contingent on not compromising national security.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement "Typewritten materials are untraceable and, therefore, impossible to link with a suspect" is false. With advancements in forensic science, it is possible to link typewritten material to a specific typewriter and potentially to a suspect. This can be done through the analysis of typewriting samples for unique characteristics, such as typeface, ribbon ink composition, and mechanical defects. Therefore, typewritten materials can sometimes be traceable and potentially provide a link to an individual.
As for the Supreme Court's stance on the press's right to print classified material, the court has determined that the right is partial. According to the Supreme Court, the press may print classified material only if it does not compromise troops or covert operatives. This means that while the press does have certain freedoms, they are not absolute and must be balanced against national security concerns.