Final answer:
Intuitive reasoning is the cognitive process in young children that involves making judgments based on incomplete or illogical information, as opposed to deductive and inductive reasoning which are more systematic approaches to logical thinking.
Step-by-step explanation:
The reasoning process of young children that relies on incomplete or illogical information is called intuitive reasoning. This type of reasoning is characterized by children making judgments or conclusions based on their personal perceptions or immediate comprehension rather than formal logic. It contrasts with deductive reasoning, a logical process where one deduces specific conclusions from general facts or premises, and inductive reasoning, where generalizations are constructed based on related observations and data.
Inductive reasoning can be common in descriptive science where observations lead to general conclusions, and is widely used though it doesn't always guarantee the truth. Meanwhile, deductive reasoning often involves hypothesis-based science where general principles are used to forecast specific results and guarantee the truth if the premises are accurate. Abstract reasoning involves thinking about objects, principles, and ideas that are not physically present, a cognitive process that generally develops in older children.
Distinguishing between these reasoning types helps us understand cognitive development and learning strategies and reinforces the importance of tailored teaching methods to foster effective reasoning skills in young learners.