Final answer:
Destiny, as the HR manager at Forward Fuels, should advise the company to comply with the OSHA General Duty Clause by actively identifying and mitigating health and safety risks, informing workers, using safer chemical alternatives, and planning for emergencies, despite the lack of specific standards for every chemical they develop.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question deals with how Destiny, the human resource manager at Forward Fuels, should respond to managers questioning the necessity of compliance with OSHA regulations due to the inability of the Department of Labor to keep up with the company's constant innovation in chemical development. Destiny should recommend that the company must remain actively engaged in identifying and mitigating potential health and safety risks even when there are no existing specific standards. This is in line with the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act, which obliges employers to provide a workplace free of serious recognized hazards.
Destiny should advise that the company should continue to inform workers about chemical hazards, deploy effective safety measures like ventilation systems to clean the air, use safer chemical alternatives, and plan for emergency responses. Despite the absence of specific regulations for every new chemical, the company is required to ensure a safe working environment and could be liable if it fails to do so. Moreover, being proactive about employee safety can prevent disastrous outcomes similar to historical industrial accidents, benefiting the company's long-term profitability and reputation.