Final answer:
Government agencies are often slower in adopting social media tools due to security and regulation concerns, particularly because these platforms can be used to spread disinformation and extremist views. Social media has a significant impact on political campaigning and public opinion, making its integration into government practices a topic of caution and careful consideration.
Step-by-step explanation:
The adoption of social media tools by government agencies is a complex issue. While some agencies may be more proactive, there is a widespread perception that government institutions are generally slower to adopt new technologies compared to the private sector. This hesitation can be partly attributed to concerns over security, privacy, and the need for stringent regulation of official communication channels. However, it's important to note that social media's role in both promoting and endangering democracy has been recognized by lawmakers in the United States. Misuse of these platforms for spreading disinformation or extremist propaganda, like the Russian interference in elections or the QAnon conspiracy, necessitates a cautious approach.
In relation to social change, social media has proven to be a powerful tool. It facilitates rapid information sharing and organizing, which can lead to significant societal impacts. Recent history has shown its capability to influence political campaigns and mobilize public opinion rapidly. Nonetheless, the challenges associated with social media, such as the potential for spreading false information and the use by extremist groups, means that its adoption by government entities might be approached with more deliberation and caution.