Final answer:
The correct answer is 'a) Gratuitous; Frauds', which indicates that a bailment is gratuitous there is generally no need for a written agreement unless the Statute of Frauds applies.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Gratuitous; Frauds.
When a bailment is gratuitous, meaning that the bailee (the party receiving the property) does not pay the bailor (the party who owns the property) for the service, there usually isn't a requirement for a written agreement. However, if the bailment falls under the Statute of Frauds, which typically applies to transactions that must satisfy certain conditions to be legally enforceable, such as agreements that cannot be performed within one year or involve the sale of goods over a certain amount, a written agreement is necessary.
This law principle helps to prevent misunderstandings or fraudulent claims regarding the terms of an agreement. It is especially relevant when the bailment involves valuable property or lasts for a longer period. Understanding the Statute of Frauds and its implications is essential for those engaged in bailments to ensure legal protection for both parties.