72.4k views
3 votes
Presents arguments both for and against the devshirme process in the Janissary units?

a. Social integration
b. Military efficiency
c. Political dissent
d. Cultural assimilation

User Applejag
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The devshirme process in Ottoman history is notable for its role in the formation of the elite Janissary military units, contributing to social integration and military efficiency, but it also faced criticism for fostering political dissent and forcefully assimilating individuals into a single culture.

Step-by-step explanation:

The devshirme process, used by the Ottoman Empire, involved capturing Christian boys from the Balkans to serve in the military—particularly in the elite Janissary units—after converting them to Islam. On the one hand, arguments for the devshirme system include social integration, as this system aimed to create a loyal class of soldiers not influenced by regional loyalties or family ties. Furthermore, it contributed to military efficiency, since devshirme provided a consistent supply of well-trained and disciplined soldiers. On the other hand, arguments against the devshirme highlight the potential for political dissent, as forcibly recruited individuals might not always remain completely loyal. Also, while the intended effect was cultural assimilation, this was a one-way process that could be seen as suppressing native cultures and causing resentment. Over time, the original strict practices of the Janissaries, such as not being allowed to marry or own property, were relaxed as they gained more power and influence.

User Ekeyme Mo
by
7.4k points