Question

Which of the following best describes presidential use of the line-item veto?

a)It has not been as effective as hoped because it cannot be used on appropriations bills.
b)It has become a common tool among modern presidents.
c)It is virtually unused by modern presidents because they fear encroaching on congressional power.
d)It is no longer in use because the Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional.
e)It tends to be used mostly by presidents during the election cycle.

Answer 1

The line-item veto is no longer in use because it was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1998.The line-item veto, created in 1996, was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1998, barring its use by presidents.

Option D is the correct answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

The best description of the presidential use of the line-item veto is that it is no longer in use because the Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional. This specific veto power was created through a law in 1996 and enabled the president to reject certain parts of a bill while signing the rest into law. However, this ability was short-lived as the Supreme Court declared the line-item veto unconstitutional in 1998, in a landmark ruling that deemed the act an unconstitutional subversion of the powers of the legislative branch. Because of this ruling, modern presidents do not have the option to use the line-item veto.

The line-item veto, established by a 1996 law, allowed the president to reject specific sections of a bill while approving the rest. However, its brief existence ended in 1998 when the Supreme Court deemed it unconstitutional. This landmark ruling highlighted its infringement on legislative powers, rendering the line-item veto unavailable for modern presidents, serving as a historical example of the judiciary limiting executive authority.