Final answer:
The pardoning power of the president is discretionary. This authority grants the president the ability to forgive individuals for federal crimes and is not subject to limitation by the other branches. While presidents may seek advice, the final decision rests solely with them and does not require counsel from the ministers or other advisors.
Step-by-step explanation:
The pardoning power of the president is indeed a significant aspect of executive authority. Under the United States Constitution, the president is granted the power to pardon individuals convicted of federal crimes. This power is one of the few that is not subject to direct limitations by the other branches of government. In historical practice, presidents have utilized this power in various ways, each with their own rationale. Notable examples include President Gerald Ford's pardon of Richard Nixon and President Jimmy Carter's amnesty to Vietnam War draft evaders, which were actions decided by the presidents alone and could not have been overturned by other branches of government.
While most executive powers are subject to checks and balances, the presidential pardon functions as an essentially discretionary power. However, presidents may consider the advice of the Department of Justice, specifically the Office of the Pardon Attorney, before reaching their decision, but they are not obligated to follow this advice or that of the cabinet. Presidents have used this power sparingly or generously based on their policy objectives and perspectives on justice. For example, presidents like Harry S. Truman issued over two thousand pardons and commutations, while others, such as Ronald Reagan or George H.W. Bush, were more reluctant to do so.
In summary, while the president may consult with advisors, the ultimate decision to pardon is discretionary and not required to be made on the aid and advice of the council of ministers or any other entity.