Final answer:
The author's bias can significantly impact the credibility of Manifest Destiny by influencing the interpretation of historical events. A critical examination of evidence, logic, and potential omissions helps evaluate the presented narrative's validity.
Step-by-step explanation:
Does the author’s bias/point of view affect the credibility and validity of the manifest destiny? Author's bias and point of view can significantly affect the credibility and validity of historical concepts such as Manifest Destiny. The way history is interpreted and presented can greatly influence our understanding of past events and ideologies. When assessing historical narratives like Manifest Destiny, a critical approach that questions the persuasiveness of evidence, logic of the position, and potential omission of relevant points is crucial. Examining whether the author has provided a balanced view or if they have ignored counterarguments can determine the degree of bias. Furthermore, understanding whether the author's conclusions are more or less acceptable based on their logic and evidence is also essential for evaluating the impact of bias on their credibility.
The concept of Manifest Destiny embraced ideas that included the expansion of the United States 'from sea to shining sea', Americanization of residents in areas of expansion, and equating the spreading of U.S. boundaries with the spreading of freedom (d. all of the above). Understanding these components helps us assess the extent to which American expansion in the 1890s was a continuation of or a departure from the original principles of Manifest Destiny in the 1840s.