165k views
0 votes
In Henrich et al. 2010, name two ways discussed by Henrich et al. in which weird samples misrepresent global variability in human cognition, behavior, and/or emotion.

a) Overemphasizing cultural universals.
b) Ignoring the impact of cultural diversity.
c) Focusing on large-scale societies.
d) Generalizing findings to non-industrialized societies.

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

In Henrich et al. 2010, two ways in which weird samples misrepresent global variability in human cognition, behavior, and/or emotion are overemphasizing cultural universals and generalizing findings to non-industrialized societies.

Step-by-step explanation:

In Henrich et al. 2010, two ways discussed in which weird samples misrepresent global variability in human cognition, behavior, and/or emotion are overemphasizing cultural universals and generalizing findings to non-industrialized societies. Overemphasizing cultural universals refers to focusing on similarities across cultures and assuming that these are representative of all cultures. Generalizing findings to non-industrialized societies means applying the results from studies conducted in industrialized societies to societies that are less industrialized.

User Kinjan Bhavsar
by
8.2k points