Final answer:
The true statement about the freedom of assembly according to the Supreme Court is that the government can restrict assembly for public safety reasons, balancing the right to assemble with the need for public order.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, which statement is true regarding freedom of assembly? The correct answer is that the government can restrict assembly for public safety reasons. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides the right to assemble peaceably and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, but it also allows for certain restrictions. These restrictions can take place when public safety, order, or other public interests are at stake. For example, assemblies may be limited to places that are considered public forums, and certain regulations such as requiring permits for large gatherings may be enforced, provided they are viewpoint-neutral and do not restrict the substantive content of the assembly.
Such limits have been necessary to balance individual freedoms with the interests of public order. The Supreme Court has ruled in cases such as Feiner v. New York that measures may be taken to disperse an assembly to maintain public safety. Therefore, while people can assemble, it is not an unrestricted right and is subject to reasonable limitations by the government.