Final answer:
The statement 'Campaigns have trouble getting rid of misinformation about their candidate' is best labeled as an inference. An inference is a logical conclusion based on evidence or known facts, and this statement implies a condition faced by many political campaigns.
Step-by-step explanation:
When trying to distinguish between different types of statements, each type has a specific definition. A fact is something that has actually occurred or is actually the case. The usual test for a statement of fact is verifiability; that is, whether it can be proven to correspond to experience. Therefore, when evaluating the sentence 'Campaigns have trouble getting rid of misinformation about their candidate,' we can say that it is an inference. It is a conclusion reached based on observable phenomena indicating that campaigns often find it challenging to combat misinformation. Inferences are not the same as facts; they are logical deductions or conclusions based on the evidence or known facts. Whereas a judgment is a subjective statement that reflects opinions or personal evaluations. A false fact, which is an oxymoron of sorts, would imply something presented as a fact but is incorrect; however, this does not apply here since the statement does not assert a truth but suggests a condition faced by campaigns. Therefore, labeling the sentence is an inference related to the trouble getting rid of misinformation fits best as it interprets a situation based on circumstances that can often be observed in political campaigns.