32.7k views
0 votes
Though they were useful as an ideal set of requirements, which of the following best describes one reason why it was necessary for researchers to update Koch's original postulates?

a) Lack of scientific rigor in Koch's original postulates
b) Evolution of understanding in microbiology
c) Limited applicability of Koch's postulates in modern medicine
d) Ethical concerns regarding Koch's research methodologies

User Ehsanul
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The evolution of understanding in microbiology was one reason why it was necessary for researchers to update Koch's original postulates.

Step-by-step explanation:

One reason why it was necessary for researchers to update Koch's original postulates is the evolution of understanding in microbiology. As scientists gained more knowledge and insights about microorganisms and diseases, it became evident that all four of Koch's postulates may not apply to every pathogen. For example, the postulates have limited applicability in modern medicine, especially when it comes to certain pathogens like viruses and prions. Therefore, updating Koch's original postulates was important to ensure that they remain relevant and useful in the field of microbiology.

User Schmelter
by
7.6k points