Final answer:
The RAND literature review did indeed find that student-centered models are effective at improving engagement and outcomes versus traditional models. This aligns with educational research indicating that students' intrinsic motivation and engagement increase in environments where they feel respected and in control of their learning.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that student-centered models improved engagement, motivation, ownership of learning, and outcomes compared to traditional classroom models, as found in a 2019 RAND literature review, is True. This aspect of educational research highlights a shift from conventional teaching methodologies to more interactive and learner-focused approaches. Narratives from educational settings support this idea, suggesting that when students feel respected and in control of their learning environment, they are more intrinsically motivated.
For instance, contrasting classroom models – one emphasizing intimidating evaluations, and the other facilitating inclusive collaboration and student-led research projects, vividly demonstrate the impact on intrinsic motivation. A student in the more collaborative environment, where student choice and respect are prioritized, is likely to be more engaged and motivated, as seen through the example of a law school student navigating different teaching styles in Family Law versus Criminal Law courses.
Thus, it is crucial to understand that classroom environments and teaching methods profoundly influence student learning experiences, shaping not just the acquisition of knowledge but also the enthusiasm and engagement with which students approach their education.